Opposition Leader Raises Concerns Over Churchill Falls MOU Review Process

Opposition Leader John Hogan is criticizing the provincial government over what he describes as a lack of transparency and independence in the review process surrounding the proposed Churchill Falls memorandum of understanding with Quebec.

In a public statement, Hogan said the creation and presentation of the review committee’s report were “deeply concerning,” arguing the process lacked openness and accountability.

Hogan said the review committee was not made available to publicly present its findings or answer questions, despite what he said had previously been promised. He also criticized the government’s decision not to disclose the names and credentials of individuals interviewed or consulted during the review.

“The lack of transparency does not promote confidence in the review and the process,” Hogan said in the statement.

The Opposition leader also accused the Premier of failing to commit to a public debate or confirm whether the government will proceed with a referendum related to the Churchill Falls negotiations.

Hogan questioned what Newfoundland and Labrador may be expected to concede to Quebec in exchange for recommendations made by the committee, saying the public has not been given enough information about the potential implications of any deal.

He further argued the province risks remaining in a position similar to the original 1969 Churchill Falls contract, which has long been criticized in Newfoundland and Labrador for providing limited financial benefits to the province.

“This approach leaves the province stuck in 1969 — with no new power, no new revenue, and no clear path forward,” Hogan said.

The Churchill Falls issue has remained politically sensitive in Newfoundland and Labrador for decades, with successive governments seeking to secure greater economic returns from the hydroelectric development in Labrador.